Statistical Summary – Railway Occurrences 2016

Foreword

This document is a summary of selected 2016 railway safety data. It covers federally regulated railways only. Non-federally regulated data reported to the TSB are not included in this report.

The TSB gathers and uses this data during the course of its investigations to analyse safety deficiencies and identify risks in the Canadian transportation system.

The 2016 data were collected according to the reporting requirements described in the TSB Regulations in force during that calendar year.

The statistics presented here reflect the TSB database at 30 March 2017. Since the occurrence data are constantly being updated in the live database, the statistics may change slightly over time.

Also, as many occurrences are not formally investigated, information recorded on some occurrences may not have been verified.

A series of data tables associated with this annual summary is also available.

Accidents

Overview of accidents and casualties

In 2016, 1,035 rail accidentsFootnote 1 were reported to the TSB (Figure 1), a 14% decrease from the 2015 total of 1,201, a 9% decrease from the 2011-2015 average of 1,132, and a 12% decrease from the 2006-2015 average of 1,173.

Figure 1. Number of rail accidents, 2007–2016
Figure 1 data table
Number of rail accidents, 2007–2016
Year Number of accidents
2007 1334
2008 1199
2009 1055
2010 1116
2011 1072
2012 1049
2013 1099
2014 1237
2015 1201
2016 1035

Freight trains accounted for approximately 32% of all trains involved in rail accidents in 2016. Six percent (69 in total) were passenger trains with the remaining 61% comprising mainly single cars/cuts of cars, locomotives and track units.

The largest proportion of reported rail accidents comprised non-main-track derailmentsFootnote 2 and collisions (58%) (Figure 2). In 2016, excluding crossing and trespasser accidents, non-main-track accidents accounted for three quarters of the total (75%). Typically, most non-main-track accidents are minor, occurring during switching operations at speeds of less than 10 mph.

Figure 2. Percentage of rail accidents by type, 2016
Figure 2 data table
Percentage of rail accidents by type, 2016
Accident type Number Percentage
Main-track collisions  5 0.5
Main-track derailments  63 6
Crossing accidents  133 13
Non-main-track collisions  73 7
Non-main-track derailments  527 51
Trespasser accidents 70 7
Other  164 16

Main-track derailments and collisions accounted for 7% of all accidents in 2016, the same as in the previous year.

In 2016, 13% of rail accidents involved vehicles or pedestrians at rail crossings, slightly down from 16% over the previous five years. The proportion of other accident typesFootnote 3 (16%) in 2016 is up from the previous five-year average (11%).

In 2016, 108 accidents involved dangerous goodsFootnote 4, down from 145 in 2015 and down from the five-year average of 141 and the ten-year average of 151. One accident resulted in a dangerous goods release in 2016, down from 6 in 2015, and down from the five-year and ten-year averages of 4. The one accident with a dangerous goods release resulted in a release of gasoline.

Figure 3. Number of fatalities by type of occurrence, 2007–2016
Figure 3 data table
Number of fatalities by type of occurrence, 2007–2016
Year Crossing accidents Trespasser accidents All others
2007 26 55 3
2008 28 45 1
2009 19 52 0
2010 24 55 2
2011 25 43 3
2012 33 44 4
2013 30 43 52
2014 21 32 3
2015 15 30 1
2016 19 47 0

Rail fatalities totalled 66 in 2016, up from 46 recorded last year but down from the five-year average of 76 and the ten-year average of 78. Crossing fatalities totalled 19 in 2016, up from 15 in 2015 but down from the five-year and ten-year averages of 25 (Figure 3). TrespasserFootnote 5 fatalities totalled 47 in 2016, up from 30 last year and up from the five-year average of 38, but almost unchanged from the ten-year average of 46. In 2016, no rail employee was fatally injured, down from the five-year average of 3 and the ten-year average of 2 employee fatalities.

A total of 56 serious injuries resulted from rail occurrences in 2016 (Figure 4), up from 50 in 2015 and up from the five-year average of 53. Trespasser injuries totalled 20 in 2016, up from 17 last year and up from the five-year average of 18. Crossing accidentsFootnote 6 resulted in 24 serious injuries, up from 18 in 2015 but down from the five-year average of 26. Thirteen rail employees were seriously injured in 2016, up from 8 in 2015 and up from 7 for the five-year average.

Figure 4. Number of serious injuries by type of occurrence, 2007–2016
Figure 4 data table
Number of serious injuries by type of occurrence, 2007–2016
Year Crossing accidents Trespasser accidents All others
2007 23 24 12
2008 37 20 8
2009 21 15 14
2010 28 19 17
2011 22 21 9
2012 32 22 19
2013 27 10 2
2014 29 21 3
2015 18 17 15
2016 24 20 12

The number of main-track accidentsFootnote 7 totalled 209 in 2016 (Figure 5), down 6% from 223 in 2015 but up 9% from the five-year average of 191 and up 6% from the ten-year average of 197. Rail activityFootnote 8 on main track increased by 0.6% from the previous year. The main-track accident rate in 2016 was 2.8 accidents per million main-track train-miles, down 7% from 3.0 in 2015, but up 14% from the five-year average of 2.46 and up 13% from the ten-year average of 2.48.

Figure 5. Number of main-track accidents and accident rates, 2007–2016
Figure 5 data table
Number of main-track accidents and accident rates, 2007–2016
Year Main-track accidents Main-track accidents per million main-track train miles
2007 258 3.1
2008 209 2.5
2009 170 2.4
2010 166 2.1
2011 201 2.6
2012 135 1.7
2013 184 2.3
2014 212 2.8
2015 223 3.0
2016 209 2.8

Accidents by type

Main-track collisions and derailments are the most serious categories of rail accidents in terms of potential risk to the public and financial loss (e.g., when passenger trains are involved or dangerous goods are released from trains that derail in populated areas).

There were 5 main-track collisions (Figure 6) in 2016, up from the 2015 total of 4 and the same as the five-year average of 5. No fatalities or serious injuries resulted from main-track collisions in 2016. There was no release of dangerous goods as a result of main-track collisions.

A total of 63 main-track derailments (Table 4a & Table 4b) were reported in 2016, an 18% decrease from the 2015 total of 77 and a 28% decrease from the five-year average of 88 (Figure 6). Sixteen of the 63 main-track derailments occurred in Ontario (25%), 14 occurred in British Columbia (22%), and 13 occurred in Alberta (21%). However, while 2 of the 16 Ontario derailments (13%) involved 6 or more cars, 6 of the 14 British Columbia derailments (43%), and 5 of the 13 Alberta derailments (38%) involved 6 or more cars.

The number of main-track derailments per million main-track train-miles decreased to 0.8 in 2016 from 1.0 the previous year and from the five-year average of 1.1.

Figure 6. Number of main-track collisions and derailments, 2007–2016
Figure 6 data table
Number of main-track collisions and derailments, 2007–2016
Year Main-track collisions Main-track derailments
2007 9 76
2008 7 67
2009 5 39
2010 4 41
2011 3 49
2012 6 35
2013 4 52
2014 9 46
2015 4 42
2016 5 38

No fatalities or serious injuries resulted from main-track derailments in 2016.

In 2016, there were 10 main-track derailments involving dangerous goods, down from 12 in 2015 and down from the five-year average of 15. None of these derailments resulted in a release of product.

In 2016, 31% of assigned factorsFootnote 9 for main-track derailments were Equipment-related,  unchanged from the five-year average of 31%. Actions-relatedFootnote 10 factors accounted for 30% of assigned factors in 2016 compared to 19% for the five-year average. Track-related factors were reported in 25% of main-track derailments in 2016 compared to the five-year average of 38%.

Non-main-track collisions (Table 5a & Table 5b) totalled 73 in 2016, down from 96 in 2015 (Figure 7) and down from the five-year average of 99. Derailments occurred in 45% of non-main-track collisions, and 45% of those non-main-track collision derailments involved the derailment of one car.

No fatalities or serious injuries resulted from non-main-track collisions in 2016.

Dangerous goods were involved in 26% of non-main-track collisions, none of which resulted in a release of product.

Factors assigned to non-main-track collisions were mostly Actions-related (86%) unchanged from the last five-year average. Failure to protect, such as improper positioning of movements and handling of switches, was assigned most often as a factor.

Figure 7. Number of non-main-track collisions and derailments, 2007–2016
Figure 7 data table
Number of non-main-track collisions and derailments, 2007–2016
Year Non main-track collisions Non main-track derailments
2007 221 572
2008 223 538
2009 188 490
2010 180 551
2011 171 493
2012 192 525
2013 184 531
2014 185 637
2015 165 630
2016 133 514

There were 527 non-main-track derailmentsFootnote 11 (Table 6a & Table 6b) in 2016, a 19% decrease from 647 last year and a 9% decrease from the five-year average of 579 (Figure 7). In 84% of these accidents, one or two cars derailed. No fatalities or serious injuries resulted from non-main-track derailments in 2016.

Dangerous goods cars were involved in 13% of non-main-track derailments, none of which resulted in a release of product.

In 2016, Actions-related factors represented 50% of all assigned factors for non-main-track derailments, up from the five-year average of 46%. Track-related factors represented 30% of all assigned factors, comparable to the five-year average of 32%. Environmental-related factors represented 11% of all assigned factors in 2016, comparable to the five-year average of 10%.

Crossing accidents (Table 7 and Table 8) represented one of the more serious types of rail accidents in 2016, with 26% of these resulting in either serious or fatal injuries.

There were 133 crossing accidents in 2016, a 19% decrease from the 2015 total of 165 and a 26% decrease from the five-year average of 179. Accidents at public automated crossings (69) decreased 13% from the 2015 total of 79 and 25% from the five-year average of 92. Accidents at public passive crossings (36) decreased 31% from the 2015 total of 52 and 43% from the five-year average of 63. Accidents at private and farm crossings (28) decreased 18% from the 2015 total of 34 but increased 15% from the five-year average of 24.

In 2016, the proportion of crossing accidents that occurred at public automated crossings was 52%, compared to 27% at public passive crossings. (Figure 8). Although there are nearly two times more public passive crossings than public automated crossings, the higher number of accidents occurring at automated crossings is due, in part, to higher vehicle and train traffic volumes at these crossings.

Figure 8. Percentage of crossing accidents by type of crossing, 2016
Figure 8 data table
Percentage of crossing accidents by type of crossing, 2016
Crossing type Number Percentage
Public passive  36 27
Public automated  69 52
Private  24 18
Farm  4 3
133 100

There were 16 fatal crossing accidents in 2016, up from the 15 reported in 2015 but down from the five-year average of 22. Although crossing accidents involving pedestrians accounted for 6% (8) of all crossing accidents in 2016, they accounted for 44% (7) of fatal crossing accidents.

Crossing-related fatalities totalled 19 in 2016, up from 15 in 2015 but down from the five-year average of 25. Pedestrians comprised 37% of crossing-related fatalities.

In 2016, 6 crossing accidents resulted in derailments, unchanged from the 2015 total and the five-year average.

There was no release of dangerous goods as a result of crossing accidents in 2016.

Quebec was the province where the most crossing accidents occurred, comprising 22% of all crossing accidents, up from its five-year average of 12% (Figure 9). Ontario had the second highest total with 20% of crossings accidents, down from 22% for its five-year average. Those provinces were followed by Alberta with 16%, Saskatchewan  and British Columbia with 14% each, and Manitoba with 11%.

Figure 9. Number of crossing accidents by province, 2016
Figure 9 data table
Number of crossing accidents by province, 2016
Province 2011-2015 average 2016
BC 20 19
Alta 45 21
Sask  30 19
Man 18 14
Ont 39 26
Que  22 29
NB  5 4
NS  2 1
Nfld/Lab 2 0
Nwt/Yukon  1 0

Trespasser accidents (Table 9) involve persons, primarily pedestrians, not authorized to be on railway rights-of-way and who are struck by rolling stock at a location other than a railway crossing. These accidents totalled 70 in 2016, up from the 2015 total of 50 and up from the five year average of 60.

In 2016, Ontario accounted for 36% of trespasser accidents with a total of 25, followed by British Columbia with 31%. Alberta accounted for 16% of all trespasser accidents(Figure 10).

Figure 10. Number of trespasser accidents by province, 2016
Figure 10 data table
Number of trespasser accidents by province, 2016
Province 2011-2015 average 2016
BC 11 22
Alta 7 11
Sask  3 3
Man 2 4
Ont 27 25
Que  7 3
NB  1 1
NS  1 1
Nfld/Lab 0 0
Nwt/Yukon  0 0

In 2016, the proportion of trespasser accidents that were fatal (66%) was up compared to the five-year average of 64%. The proportion of trespasser accidents resulting in serious injuries (29%) was lower than the five-year average of 31%.

Incidents

Overview of incidents

In 2016, there were 188 reported rail incidents (Figure 11), down from the total of 216 incidents in 2015, and down from the five year average of 226 and the ten-year average of 218. Movement exceeds the limit of authorityFootnote 12 (71% of reportable incidents) continued to be the main incident type since 2007, followed by dangerous goods leakers (16%), runaway rolling stock (5%), and main-track switch in abnormal position (4%).

In addition to the 9 runaway rolling stock incidents in 2016, 33 accidents involving runaway rolling stock occurred, for a total of 42 occurrences involving runaway rolling stock in 2016, comparable to the 43 of those occurrences in 2015.

Figure 11. Number of rail incidents, 2007–2016
Figure 11 data table
Number of rail incidents, 2007–2016
Year Number of incidents
2007 223
2008 216
2009 209
2010 188
2011 233
2012 238
2013 224
2014 218
2015 216
2016 188

In 2016, there were 133 incidents where the movement exceeded the limit of authority, a 6% decrease from the 142 recorded in 2015 but a 10% increase from the five-year average of 121 (Figure 12).

Figure 12. Number of rail incidents by type, 2016
Figure 12 data table
Number of rail incidents by type, 2016
Rail incidents by type 2011-2015 average 2016
Crew member incapacitated  3 1
Unprotected overlap of authorities  5 4
Signal less restrictive than required  2 1
Runaway rolling stock  14 9
Movement exceeds limits of authority  121 133
Main-track switch in abnormal position  8 7
Dangerous goods leaker  72 30

A dangerous goods (DG) leaker incidentFootnote 13 is the unintentional release of a hazardous material while in transit, and does not involve an accident. The reported DG leaker incidents totalled 30 in 2016, which is a 9% decrease from the 2015 total of 33 and a 59% decrease from the five-year average of 72. While DG leaker incidents represented 39% of all incidents in 2007, they accounted for 16% of reported rail incidents in 2015 (Figure 12).

The decrease in DG leaker incidents in 2014, 2015 and 2016 was due in part to the harmonization of the new rail regulations with Part 8 of the TDG Regulations. A DG release of flammable liquid (Class 3) is a reportable incident if more than 200 litres are released. The new regulations do not specify a threshold for reportable gas releases (Class 2).

Definitions

The following definitions apply to railway occurrences that are required to be reported pursuant to the Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board Act and the associated regulations.

Railway occurrence

  • Any accident or incident associated with the operation of rolling stock on a railway
  • Any situation or condition that the Board has reasonable grounds to believe could, if left unattended, induce an accident or incident described below

Reportable railway accident

  • A person is killed or sustains a serious injury as a result of
    • getting on or off or being on board the rolling stock, or
    • coming into contact with any part of the rolling stock or its contents
  • The rolling stock or its contents
    • sustain damage that affects the safe operation of the rolling stock,
    • cause or sustain a fire or explosion, or
    • cause damage to the railway that poses a threat to the safe passage of rolling stock or to the safety of any person, property or the environment

Reportable railway incident

  • A risk of collision occurs between rolling stock
  • An unprotected main track switch or subdivision track switch is left in an abnormal position
  • A railway signal displays a less restrictive indication than that required for the intended movement of rolling stock
  • Rolling stock occupies a main track or subdivision track, or track work takes place, in contravention of the Rules or any regulations made under the Railway Safety Act
  • Rolling stock passes a signal indicating stop in contravention of the Rules or any regulations made under the Railway Safety Act
  • There is an unplanned and uncontrolled movement of rolling stock
  • A crew member whose duties are directly related to the safe operation of the rolling stock is unable to perform their duties as a result of a physical incapacitation which poses a threat to the safety of persons, property or the environment, or
  • There is an accidental release on board or from a rolling stock consisting of a quantity of dangerous goods or an emission of radiation that is greater than the quantity or emission level specified in Part 8 of the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations

Serious injury

  • A fracture of any bone, except simple fractures of fingers, toes or the nose
  • Lacerations that cause severe hemorrhage or nerve, muscle or tendon damage
  • An injury to an internal organ
  • Second or third degree burns, or any burns affecting more than 5% of the body surface
  • A verified exposure to infectious substances or injurious radiation, or
  • An injury that is likely to require hospitalization

Dangerous goods involvement

“Dangerous goods” has the same meaning as in section 2 of the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act, 1992. An accident is considered to have dangerous goods involvement if any car in the consist carrying (or having last contained) a dangerous good derails, strikes or is struck by any other rolling stock or object. It does not mean that there was any release of any product. Also included are crossing accidents in which the motor vehicle involved (e.g., tanker truck) is carrying a dangerous good.

Derailment

Any instance where one or more wheels of rolling stock have come off the normal running surface of the rail, including occurrences where there are no injuries and no damage to track or equipment.

Footnotes

Footnote 1

Refer to the appendix for the definition of reportable railway accident.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

“Derailment” means any instance where one or more wheels of rolling stock have come off the normal running surface of the rail.

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Other accident types include but are not limited to collisions/derailments involving track units, rolling stock collision with object, or employee/passenger accidents.

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Footnote 4

Accidents involving dangerous goods can include road vehicles carrying dangerous goods.

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Footnote 5

Trespasser accidents involve persons, primarily pedestrians, not authorized to be on railway rights-of-way and who are struck by rolling stock other than at railway crossings.

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Footnote 6

A crossing accident occurs when railway rolling stock is involved in a grade-crossing collision with a motor vehicle or pedestrian, resulting in death, serious injury or property damage.

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Footnote 7

Accidents which occur on main-track or spurs (not including crossing and trespasser accidents) are combined in order to match the figures used in the activity data, which is based on combined main track and spur million track miles.

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Footnote 8

As provided to TSB by the Strategic Information Branch of Transport Canada.

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Footnote 9

Occurrences are normally reported to TSB with one assigned factor. Since multiple factors can contribute to an occurrence, the TSB may assign additional factors to an occurrence. Note that when multiple factors are assigned to an accident, they are considered to have acted in combination to contribute to the occurrence.

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

Actions-related factors are, but not limited to, non-compliance with prescribed procedures such as failure to protect or failure to secure. Note that in previous publications, Actions-related factors were referred to as Rules-related factors.

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

New TSB regulations came into effect on 01 July 2014. The new regulations require that all derailments be reported, including minor derailments where there were no injuries and no damage to track or equipment.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

A movement exceeds limits of authority incident occurrs when rolling stock occupies a main track or subdivision track, or track work takes place, in contravention of the Rules or any regulations made under the Railway Safety Act.

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

Under the new reporting requirements the minimum reporting threshold for incidents (200 litres) involving the release of low vapour pressure flammable liquids has been harmonized with Part 8 of the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations. Formerly, any release of that product type was reportable.

Return to footnote 13 referrer