TSB Recommendation A03-08

In response to Recommendation A03-08, Transport Canada (TC) provided the following comments:

• TC supports the recommendation concerning the installation of image recording systems to supplement the current flight recording requirements.
• TC will work with other Civil Aviation Authorities to develop a harmonized approach to image recorder system standards.
• TC will take regulatory action to implement the requirement to install video imaging equipment in cockpits of transport category aeroplanes in commercial service.

TC's response details actions that, if fully implemented, will satisfy the aim of Recommendation A03-08. Consequently, the response is assessed as Satisfactory Intent.

In its activity update dated 14 December 2005, TC stated that any future rulemaking activity is contingent on international harmonized requirements.

In response to several NTSB "image recorder" recommendations on 26 February 2006, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposed a Technical Standard Order for Aircraft Image Recorder Systems. Additionally, the FAA is working with the NTSB to develop a "proof-of-concept" test that will install an image recorder system in a simulator and on an FAA airplane. Presumably, these activities may result in FAA rulemaking. TC's letter of 14 December 2005 indicates that future rulemaking activity will be contingent on internationally harmonized requirements. The stated action, if fully implemented, will substantially reduce the risks associated with Recommendation A03-08.

Therefore, the assessment remains at Satisfactory Intent.

TC's response repeats its support for the installation of image recording systems as suggested in Recommendation A03-08. TC states that it will continue to participate with other CAAs in harmonization activities addressing the requirements for imaging recording systems. Finally, it states that once harmonization is achieved it will initiate, through its rule making process, an NPA regarding the requirement to install video imaging equipment in cockpits of transport category aeroplane in commercial service.

The Board is aware that TC has adopted a harmonized approach to the development of requirements as suggested in Recommendation A03-08. This latest response confirms that TC's action plan if fully implemented will substantially reduce the risks associated with Recommendation A03-08. Consequently, the assessment remains as Satisfactory Intent.

In its response of 11 March 2008, TC states that image recording of the flight deck environment is a new technology that is approaching maturity. TC has been closely monitoring this development through its membership in the European Organization for Civil Aviation Equipment working group, and will continue to work with ICAO and other civil aviation authorities to ensure that a harmonized rule is introduced when appropriate.

TC intends to harmonize with the FAA once the equipment standards and installation requirements have been defined and found acceptable by certification authorities. Once a harmonized approach is achieved, TC will submit an NPA regarding the requirement to install video imaging equipment in cockpits of transport category aeroplanes in commercial service.

TC considers this recommendation closed as future rule marking activity contingent on internationally harmonized requirements.

The Board appreciates that TC has adopted a harmonized approach to the development of image recording systems requirements as suggested in Recommendation A03-08. Its latest response confirms that TC's action plan if fully implemented will substantially reduce the risks associated with Recommendation A03-08.

Consequently, the assessment remains as Satisfactory Intent.

In January 2010 the FAA provided an update with respect to its activity related to TSB Recommendation A03-08. In July 2005, the FAA partnered with the NTSB, Securaplane, and Physical Optics to do a proof-of-concept test of a video imaging system on an FAA King Air aircraft at the FAA Technical Center in Atlantic City, NJ.

The focus of the test was to see if accurate parametric data could be collected from a video at different frame rates and resolutions. The images collected during the test were evaluated by the NTSB and parametric data derived for over 50 parameters that were equivalent to the data collected by the Digital Flight Data Recorder. The test also revealed several weaknesses of image recording which need to be addressed before any mandate is feasible. The results and analysis of this test are being compiled into a report to be completed in 2010.

The FAA has been participating on an international workgroup (EUROCAE WG50) which has just completed work on ED112 entitled Minimum Operational Performance Specification for Crash Protected Airborne Recorder Systems. This document defines the performance specifications for all flight recorders including image recorders. Several issues make promulgating a regulation requiring the installation of a camera in the cockpit a challenge, including concerns about the use of the recordings for other than accident investigation purposes.

The Board appreciates the FAA's update. The details identify the various FAA initiatives designed to support regulatory change to fit aeroplanes with image recording systems.

Its latest response confirms that FAA action plan, if fully implemented, will substantially reduce the risks associated with Recommendation A03-08.

Consequently, the assessment remains as Satisfactory Intent.

TC states that, since November 2010, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has required the installation of Airborne Image Recorders, which is considered a component of Flight Data Recorders. Under the Canadian CVR/FDR rulemaking initiative, TC will consider harmonization of CAR requirements with this ICAO requirement. Presentation of NPAs is planned for the September 2011 Canadian Aviation Regulation Advisory Council (CARAC) Technical Committee meeting.

The Board believes that, if TC harmonizes with the ICAO requirement, the risk associated with Recommendation A03-08 will be substantially reduced.

Consequently, the assessment remains as Satisfactory Intent.

May 2011 Input

An Issue Paper will be presented at the September 2011 Technical Committee to discuss the Transport Canada proposal with regards to amending requirements for CVR/FDR.

September 2011 update

There remain both technical and social questions regarding implementation of Aircraft with Image Recording Systems. As a result, TCCA will not pursue a domestic requirement until an internationally harmonized solution resolves both the technical and social issues that remain.

TC's latest response indicates that it will not initiate a domestic Image Recording Systems rulemaking initiative until an internationally harmonized solution resolves both the technical and social issues that remain. However, the response does not indicate what, if any, international regulatory forum has been mandated to resolve these outstanding issues.

While there has been progress in developing internationally acceptable specifications for the design of image recorders (e.g. TSO-C176, Aircraft Cockpit Image Recorder Systems) and their installations (e.g. EUROCAE ED-112, Minimum Operational Performance Specifications for Crash Protected Airborne Recorder Systems), regulatory amendments to require their use in aircraft have yet to be enacted. The inclusion of airborne image recorders as part of ICAO's Annex 6, Standards and Recommended Practices for the Operation of Aircraft, Parts I, II and III, is gratifying but limited as an optional installation for turbine-powered aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take-off mass of 5 700 kg or less for which a type certificate is first issued on or after 1 January 2016.

Given that airborne image recorder technical specifications are published, the obstacle to mitigating the residual risk associated with Recommendation A03-08 would appear to be the lack of a harmonized approach by civil aviation authorities to deal with the barriers associated with implementing regulatory change. TC offers no action plan to mitigate this residual risk.

The response is considered Unsatisfactory.

In concurrence with the recommendation made by the ICAO Air Navigation Commission on 16 November 2010, where it was agreed upon to defer the initial proposal for airborne image recorders (AIR) pending the work of the multidisciplinary task force on the protection of safety information, TC will not pursue further actions in addressing the recommendation made for image recording in the cockpit.

TC reiterates its position that it will not pursue any actions related to image recording in the cockpit. Instead it has deferred such action to ICAO and specifically to a multidisciplinary task force on the protection of safety information.

The TSB believes the ICAO entity referred to in TC's response is the Safety Information Protection Task Force (SIP TF). Information provided by ICAO indicates that the SIP TF was formed to provide recommendations for new or enhanced ICAO provisions and guidance material related to the protection of safety information, including standards 5.12 and 8.3 as well as Attachment E to Annex 13. Its activities began in May 2011 and to date it has established working groups to review existing ICAO provisions related to the protection of safety information; reviewed States' legal frameworks and practices related to this subject; and developed a strategy to promote the coordination among safety, administrative, judicial and prosecutorial authorities when dealing with the protection of safety information.

While airborne image recorder technical specifications are published and available to the industry, the lack of a harmonized approach by civil aviation authorities to implement regulatory change regarding the use of image recorders remains the challenge. ICAO's SIP TF initiative would appear to be a logical first step in any move toward requiring image recorders in an effort to mitigate the residual risk associated with Recommendation A03-08; however, no further action is being taken by TC for the time being.

The response is considered Unsatisfactory.